Text this colour links to Pages. Text this colour links to Family Trees. Text this colour are links that disabled for Guests.
Place the mouse over images to see a larger image. Click on paintings to see the painter's Biography Page.
Mouse over links for a preview. Move the mouse off the painting or link to close the popup.

The History of William Marshal, Earl of Chepstow and Pembroke, Regent of England. Book 1 of 2, Lines 1-10152.

The History of William Marshal was commissioned by his son shortly after William’s death in 1219 to celebrate the Marshal’s remarkable life; it is an authentic, contemporary voice. The manuscript was discovered in 1861 by French historian Paul Meyer. Meyer published the manuscript in its original Anglo-French in 1891 in two books. This book is a line by line translation of the first of Meyer’s books; lines 1-10152. Book 1 of the History begins in 1139 and ends in 1194. It describes the events of the Anarchy, the role of William’s father John, John’s marriages, William’s childhood, his role as a hostage at the siege of Newbury, his injury and imprisonment in Poitou where he met Eleanor of Aquitaine and his life as a knight errant. It continues with the accusation against him of an improper relationship with Margaret, wife of Henry the Young King, his exile, and return, the death of Henry the Young King, the rebellion of Richard, the future King Richard I, war with France, the death of King Henry II, and the capture of King Richard, and the rebellion of John, the future King John. It ends with the release of King Richard and the death of John Marshal.

Available at Amazon in eBook and Paperback format.

1310-1319 Piers Gaveston

1310-1319 Piers Gaveston is in 14th Century Events.

Council of Ordainers

Around 19th March 1311 the nobility attempt to constrain King Edward II of England (age 26) by imposing a Council of Ordainers upon him. The Council included twenty-one signatories including:

Guy Beauchamp 10th Earl Warwick (age 39).

Robert Clifford 1st Baron Clifford (age 36).

Thomas Plantagenet 2nd Earl of Leicester, 2nd Earl Lancaster, Earl of Salisbury and Lincoln (age 33).

Gilbert de Clare 8th Earl Gloucester 7th Earl Hertford (age 19).

Henry Lacy 4th Earl Lincoln, Earl Salisbury.

John Capet 4th Earl Richmond (age 45).

William Marshal 1st Baron Marshal (age 33), and.

Aymer de Valence 2nd Earl Pembroke (age 36).

Become a Member via our Buy Me a Coffee page to read more.

Exile of Piers Gaveston

In April 1311 Parliament exiled Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 27). Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland by King Edward II of England (age 26) who immediately started to plot for his return.

Gaveston Returns from Exile

On 13th January 1312 King Edward II of England (age 27) and Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 28) were reunited at Knaresborough Castle [Map].

Gaveston's Escape from Newcastle

Gaveston Surrenders

On 19th May 1312 Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 28) surrendered to Aymer de Valence 2nd Earl Pembroke (age 37), John Warenne 7th Earl of Surrey (age 25), Henry Percy 9th and 1st Baron Percy (age 39) and Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall who were besieging the castle. The terms of the surrender were that Pembroke, Warenne and Percy would take Gaveston to York, where the barons would negotiate with the king.

Capture, Trial and Execution of Piers Gaveston

On 9th June 1312 Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 28), under the protection of Aymer de Valence 2nd Earl Pembroke (age 37), stayed at The Rectory, Deddington whilst en route south. Aymer de Valence 2nd Earl Pembroke left Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall there whilst he left to visit his wife. The following morning Guy Beauchamp 10th Earl Warwick (age 40), with Edmund Fitzalan 2nd or 9th Earl of Arundel (age 27), Humphrey Bohun 4th Earl Hereford 3rd Earl Essex (age 36) and John Botetort 1st Baron Botetort (age 47) arrested Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall and took him to Warwick Castle [Map].

On 19th June 1312 Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 28) was taken to Blacklow Hill, Warwickshire [Map] where he was beheaded. Earl Cornwall extinct. Blacklow Hill, Warwickshire [Map] being outside of the lands of Guy Beauchamp 10th Earl of Warwick (age 40). Gaveston's body was left where it lay eventually being recovered by Dominican friars who took it to King's Langley Priory, Hertfordshire [Map].

The History of William Marshal, Earl of Chepstow and Pembroke, Regent of England. Book 1 of 2, Lines 1-10152.

The History of William Marshal was commissioned by his son shortly after William’s death in 1219 to celebrate the Marshal’s remarkable life; it is an authentic, contemporary voice. The manuscript was discovered in 1861 by French historian Paul Meyer. Meyer published the manuscript in its original Anglo-French in 1891 in two books. This book is a line by line translation of the first of Meyer’s books; lines 1-10152. Book 1 of the History begins in 1139 and ends in 1194. It describes the events of the Anarchy, the role of William’s father John, John’s marriages, William’s childhood, his role as a hostage at the siege of Newbury, his injury and imprisonment in Poitou where he met Eleanor of Aquitaine and his life as a knight errant. It continues with the accusation against him of an improper relationship with Margaret, wife of Henry the Young King, his exile, and return, the death of Henry the Young King, the rebellion of Richard, the future King Richard I, war with France, the death of King Henry II, and the capture of King Richard, and the rebellion of John, the future King John. It ends with the release of King Richard and the death of John Marshal.

Available at Amazon in eBook and Paperback format.

Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker of Swinbroke. In the year of Christ 1312,1 around the Feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist [24th June], for the defence of Piers Gaveston, he was removed from Bamburgh Castle [Map] and placed under the custody of Aymer de Valence (age 37), Earl of Pembroke. The Earl had sworn before the King, having taken the most sacred oath upon the altar, that he would protect Gaveston from all his enemies for a certain period, within which the King intended to reconcile him with the barons. However, envy, which corrupts even the greatest loyalties, and the desire to please Gaveston's enemies, led his guardian to abandon his oath through negligence. Eventually, Gaveston was taken against his will by one of his familiar enemies and delivered into the hands of his foes at Deddington Manor, located between Oxford and Warwick. There, neither natural hiding places nor fortifications could shield him from the proximity of the Earl of Warwick. That night, Pembroke departed from Gaveston, and at dawn, Guy de Beauchamp (age 40), Earl of Warwick, accompanied by a small force and great commotion, arrived. Gaveston was then taken to Warwick Castle, where, after deliberation with Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, and Humphrey, Earl of Hereford, he was executed in their presence at a place called Blacklow Hill [Map] on the 19th June 1312. His body was entrusted to an honourable burial2 in the Dominican friary at Langley [Map] by order of the King.

Anno Christi MCCCXJ, circa festum Nativitatis Ioannis Baptiste, pro defensione Petri, Petrus revocatus a castro de Bamborgh committitur custodie Adomari de Valence, comitis Penbrochie, adiurati coram rege, inspecto sancto sanctorum sacramento altaris, quod ipsum indempnem quatenus posset contra omnes adversarios suos custodiret ad certum tempus, citra quod intendebat rex alico modo Petrum regni proceribus reconciliasse. Set fidem invidia inter summa lacescens et amor placendi inimicis Petri tutorem ipsius contra iuramentum in negligenciam abduxerunt. Ducitur tandem Petrus quo non vellet per familiarem inimicum in mediam potestatem inimicorum, in manerium videlicet Dathintone, que est inter Oxoniam et Warewyc, ubi nec latibulum naturale nec castrum aut munimentum aliquod artificiale posset a vicinitate comitis Warewyc Petrum sequestrare, Adomarus nocte ab ipso Petro recessit, et in aurora Guido Warewyc cum comitiva mediocri et cum hutesio accessit. Petrum quoque ductum ad castrum Warewyk, habita deliberacione cum Thoma comite Lancastrie et comite Herefordie, in ipsorum conspectu in loco qui dicitur Caveresich XIX die mensis Iunii fecit decapitari; cuius corpus in ecclesia fratrum ordinis Predicatorum de Langliþe rex honourifice commisit sepulture.

Note 1. Baker has entirely omitted Gaveston's movements in 1311-12. He seems to have confused Bamburgh and Scarborough. By the Ordinances, Gaveston was again banished 1st November 1311. He went to Flanders, but returned almost immediately, and rejoined Edward at York at the beginning of the new year; the king's writ declaring his banishment illegal bearing date the 18th January 1312. Rymer's Fœdera 2.153; Annales Londonienses 203.

On the approach of the confederate lords Gaveston fled from Newcastle and took refuge in Scarborough early in May; was besieged, and surrendered, 19th May, to the earl of Pembroke. Annales Londonienses 204.

The Chronicle of Lanercost 217.

The story of his surrender and subsequent capture by Warwick is told by the Monk of Malmesbury, Vita Edward II, 177.

Warwick made Gaveston his prisoner at Deddington on the 10th June, Annales Londonienses 206.

He gave him over to Lancaster, who with his confederates led him out to execution, the earl of Warwick remaining in his castle. Murimuth (Rolls Series), p. 17, is evidently wrong in stating that Warwick dismissed him and that he was afterwards made prisoner again. In the following extract from the Annales Londonienses 207.

The nicknames which Gaveston gave, with such deadly offence, to certain lords are noticed by several of the chroniclers. All does not appear to have been properly explained. The Chronicle of Lanercost 216.

The prose Brute chronicle has also some interesting particulars on this point. This chronicle is extant in both a French and an English version. Of the French version there are two editions, both compiled in the reign of Edward III, and ending with the account of the battle of Halidon Hill in 1333. From the second edition of this French version the English version was translated; and to this translation further additions were subsequently made. The names of the writers are unknown, but it appears that one of the later editions of the English version is due to John Maundeville, rector of Burnham Thorp, co. Norfolk, 1427-1441 (Notes and Queries, 1856, p. 1.) To the authorship of the second edition of the French version perhaps a clue may be found in certain extracts, or rather translations, from a French chronicle, which are printed in Leland's Collectanea, 1.454. Many of these extracts prove that much of Pakington's chronicle must have been word for word the same as the revised edition of the French Brute. The English Brute chronicle was printed by Caxton in 1480, with the title Chronicles of England.

Caxton's Chronicles do not appear to have had the attention of modern historians as much as they deserve. Barnes, the writer of the History of Edward III, 1688, did not know the book; but he found in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, a MS. of the English Brute chronicle, and made ample use of it, referring to it as MS. Vet. Angl. in C.C.C. Cantab. Barnes's quotations have been cited by later writers, who have failed to recognize in them the text of Caxton. In the following notes I have printed some interesting passages from the English Brute, making use of Harley MS. 2279 and Egerton MS. 650.

Gaveston's nicknames for the barons are thus described: "Kyng Edward lovede Piers of Gavastone so moche that he mygte nougte forlete his companye; and so moche the kyng yaf and behigte to the peple of Engelonde that the exiling of the forsaide Piers shulde bene revokede atte Staunford thurj hem that him exilede. Wherfore Peris of Gavastone come ayen into Engelonde, and, when he was come ayen into this lande, he despisede the gretteste lordes of this lande, and callede sire Robert of Clare, erle of Gloucestre, horeson; and the erle of Nicole, sire Henry Lacy, brust bely; and sir Guy, erle of Warwyke, blak hounde of Arderne; and also he callede the noble erle and gentil Thomas of Lancastre cherle; and meny other scornes and shame hem saide, and by many other grete lordes of Engelonde. Wherfor thei were towardis him ful angry and sore annoyede." The terms for these names in the French version (Royal Ms. 20 A. 3) are 'filz a puteyne', 'boele crevee,' 'noir chien de Ardene,' and 'vielers.' This last word the English translator has not understood. In the extract in Leland's Collectanea there are additional words: 'vielers, porceo quil est greles et de bel entaille.' Misunderstanding the first two words of this sentence, Lingard has made out that Lancaster was called 'Old Hog.' But the words mean: 'Fiddler, because he is slim and tall.' This seems to be confirmed by Walsingham (Historia Anglicana, 1.115) who says that Gaveston called Lancaster 'histrionem,' and further that Pembroke was nicknamed 'Joseph the Jew,' the reason being 'quod pallidus erat et longus [because he was pale and tall].' The 'pallidus' and 'longus,' which do not appear to be specially descriptive of a Jew, would perhaps belong better to the 'Play-actor,' just as 'greles' and 'de bel entaille' are applied to the 'Fiddler.'

Note 2. Gaveston's body lay for two years at Oxford, Vita Edward II, 209: "A few days after Christmas, the lord King Edward had the body of Piers Gaveston, his former special friend, transferred from Oxford to Langley. For now more than two years had passed since Peter's beheading, and until this time he had lain unburied among the friars at Oxford. It is said that the king had intended first to avenge Peter's death, and only afterward to commit his body to burial. But now those from whom the king had once sought vengeance had been reconciled with him in friendship. So the king, at Langley, where he had previously established a house for the Dominican friars, had the body of his Peter buried with great honour.

See also Knighton 2533, Annales Londonienses 232 and Annales Paulini 273.

Annals Londonienses. On the Monday immediately before the feast of Saint John the Baptist, in the aforementioned year, that is, on the 19th day of June, the aforesaid counts came to Warwick with their men and requested the body of the said Peter from the aforementioned Earl of Warwick; the aforementioned Earl of Warwick delivered the body to the said counts, safe and sound; and they had the body of the said Peter taken out of the town of Warwick, and out of the fief of the said Earl of Warwick to Gaversweche [Map], between Warwick and Kenilworth, in the fief of the Earl of Lancaster, and there he was beheaded, around noon, by the hands of a certain Breton, in front of all the people assembled there. And thus each returned to his own place, leaving the body of the said Peter in the area where he was beheaded. Then four cobblers from Warwick placed the body of the deceased on a ladder, carrying it back towards Warwick, there to be buried; but the Earl of Warwick, who had not left the castle throughout the time of the beheading, had the body taken back to the same place where he was first beheaded, outside his fief; and behold, the Dominican friars led his body to Oxford, where it is kept with much honor: hence, they are greatly hated by the aforementioned counts.

Die ergo Lunæ proxima ante festum Sancti Johannis Baptistæ, anno prædicto, videlicet xix die Junii, prædicti comites cum suis venerunt apud Warwyke et petierunt corpus dicti Petri a prædicto comite Warwiciæ; quem prædictus comes Warwiciæ dictis comitibus tradidit corpus ejus sanum et salvum; at ipsi fecerunt conduci corpus dicti Petri extra villam Warwiciæ, et extra feodum dicti comitis Warwiciæ ad Gaverissweche, inter Warwyk et Kilneworthe, in feodo comitis Lancastriæ, et ibidem fuit decollatus, circa horam meridiei, per manus cujusdam Britonis, coram omni populo ibidemn coadunato. Et sic recesserunt unusquisque ad propria, relinquentes corpus dicti Petri in area ubi ipse decollatus est. Tunc quatuor sutores de Warwick posuerunt corpus mortui super scalam, reportantes versus Warwyk, ibidem sepeliendum; sed et comes Warwiciæ, qui toto tempore decollationis non exivit de castro, fecit corpus reportare ad ecundem locum, ubi prius decollatus fuit extra feodum suum; et ecce fratres Jacobini conduxerunt corpus ejus apud Oxoniam, ubi multum honorifice custoditur: unde multum sunt in odio de comitibus prædietis.

Become a Member via our Buy Me a Coffee page to read more.

Lanercost Chronicle. 19th June 1312. Having surrendered, he [Piers Gaveston 1st Earl Cornwall (age 28)] was committed to the custody of Sir Aymer de Valence (age 37), Earl of Pembroke, who had ever before been his chief enemy, and about the feast of the nativity of John the Baptist, in the absence of Aymer de Valence, he was beheaded on the high road [Map] near the town of Warwick by command of the Earl of Lancaster (age 34) and the Earl of Warwick (age 40).

Tour de Nesle Affair

Bourgeois de Valenciennes. That King Charles took as his wife Blanche1, daughter of Mahaut, Countess of Artois. This Blanche died in prison for misconduct of her body, of which she was accused, along with others of the kingdom of France. And so too did the wife [Margaret] of King Louis, his elder brother; for two knightly brothers, sons of the lord of Aunay, were flayed at Pontoise in the time of the fair King Philip. And likewise the wife of King Philip [Joan], the middle of the three brothers, was accused and named in the matter; but he would not believe it, rather saying that he held her to be a good lady and a virtuous woman in her conduct.

Celuy roy Charles eult à femme Blance fille Mehault contesse d'Artois, laquele Blance morut en prison pour male fachon de son corps qu’on luy ametoit, et pluseurs du royalme de France. Et ossy fist la femme du roy Loys son aisné frère, dont II frères chevaliers, fils du seigneur d’Aunay, en furent escorchiés à Pontoise du tamps du beau roy Philippe. Et encore en fut notée et nommée la femme du roy Philippe le moyen des III frères; mais il ne le veult mye croire, ains dit qu’il la tenoit à bonne dame et à preude femme de son corps.

Note 1. King Charles IV of France and Blanche of Burgundy married in 1308. In 1314 the 'Tour de Nesle Affair' emerged in which Blanche and her sister Joan, wife of Philip, Count of Poitiers, later King Philip V of France, and sister-in-law Margaret of Burgundy, wife of King Louis X of France, were accused of adultery with knights. Joan was acquitted. Chronicle of Nangis Continuation: "Margaret, the young queen of Navarre, and Blanche, wife of Charles, the king of Navarre’s younger brother, for the adultery most shamefully committed and frequently practiced by them with the knight brothers Philip and Walter of Aunay, the former [Margaret] with Philip, the latter [Blanche] with Walter, as their crimes demanded, were repudiated by their own husbands, deprived, not undeservedly, of all temporal honour, and committed to prisons, so that there under strict guard, deprived of all human comfort, they might pass their lives unhappily and end them miserably. The aforesaid two knights, who were not only wicked adulterers but also most vile violators of their lords’ marriages, though those lords had placed especial trust in them as highly intimate members of their household, and they were reckoned among their garments and family in full confidence, and who were the worst of traitors; and who were much more culpable in the deed, since they had enticed those young women, still of tender age and of the weaker sex, by their seductions and flatteries. At Pontoise, on the Friday after Quasimodo Sunday, confessed that they had carried on this crime for nearly three years, in many places and sometimes even at sacred seasons. And for the commission of so great a crime, paying the penalty and manner of an ignominious death, in the common square of the Martroi, in the sight of all, they were flayed alive; their virile members together with their genitals were cut off; and, their heads struck off, they were dragged to the common gallows. Completely stripped of skin, they were hanged by the shoulder blades and joints of their arms. Afterwards, near them, a certain doorkeeper, as one who seemed rightly to have been an accomplice and privy to the aforesaid crime, and many others as well, both noble and ignoble, of either sex, who appeared to have consented to or known of the said offense, were subjected to torture; some were drowned in swift waters; many perished by secret deaths; yet several, found innocent, escaped entirely. Among these especially was a certain Dominican friar, called the Bishop of Saint George, who was said to have been a collaborator and accomplice in the aforesaid crime, whether by sorceries that incited people to illicit acts. Some said he was detained in prison at Paris among the Dominican friars; others that, since the apostolic see was then vacant, he had been sent to the cardinals and left to their judgment. Moreover, although Joan, sister of the said Blanche and wife of Philip, Count of Poitiers, was at first strongly regarded as suspect in the matter and was for some time separated from her husband and kept under guard in the castle of Dourdan, nevertheless, after an inquiry made on this account, she was cleared of the said suspicion and judged blameless and entirely innocent in the Parliament at Paris, in the presence of the Count of Valois, the Count of Évreux, and many other nobles. And thus, before a year had passed, she deserved to be reconciled to her husband, the count."

And the Matrical Chronicle of Godefroy de Paris, Lines 6222-6271:

In that year then, in May,

A time full of joy

Was turned into adversity

For the kingdom, of which men will speak

As long as the world shall endure.

All song and mirth and gladness

Were turned to great distress,

By the event that then in France befell;

For which it was fitting to flay

Two knights, handsome and gay,

Gautier and Philippe d’Aunay.

Of father and mother they were brothers.

It was because they maintained,

The one, the sister of the Duke of Burgundy,

Bringing upon her great shame;

The other brother dishonoured the daughter

Of Burgundy, of whom France is ashamed.

Wrongly the matter runs everywhere.

The count’s daughter indeed had

A sister who knew nothing

Of the queen and of her sister,

For she was not of their inner circle,

Nor called to the secret counsel.

Thus she saw on many a day

Many a sign that displeased her;

But of this she dared not speak,

For the shame of her lineage,

And to avoid anger and harm;

For he who keeps all silent

Has peace with all, and pleases none.

But there is no fire without smoke.

Thus the matter went its course.

The deed was discovered and proved,

Which had long lain hidden;

And it was openly known

Of Philippe, that he had lain

Many times, with her consent,

And without force or resistance,

With the Queen of Navarre;

And all that he wished to ask of her

He had entirely.

I know not by what nor how

Thus those two came to agreement,

But in many ways did people speak of it;

Some commonly said

They agreed by enchantment;

Others said

They did it without enchantment.

Believe whichever you will,

But not all that you hear.

Become a Member via our Buy Me a Coffee page to read more.

Chronicle of William Nangis, -1300. Margaret, the young queen of Navarre, and Blanche, wife of Charles, the king of Navarre’s younger brother, for the adultery most shamefully committed and frequently practiced by them with the knight brothers Philip and Walter of Aunay, the former [Margaret] with Philip, the latter [Blanche] with Walter, as their crimes demanded, were repudiated by their own husbands, deprived, not undeservedly, of all temporal honour, and committed to prisons, so that there under strict guard, deprived of all human comfort, they might pass their lives unhappily and end them miserably. The aforesaid two knights, who were not only wicked adulterers but also most vile violators of their lords’ marriages, though those lords had placed especial trust in them as highly intimate members of their household, and they were reckoned among their garments and family in full confidence, and who were the worst of traitors; and who were much more culpable in the deed, since they had enticed those young women, still of tender age and of the weaker sex, by their seductions and flatteries. At Pontoise, on the Friday after Quasimodo Sunday, confessed that they had carried on this crime for nearly three years, in many places and sometimes even at sacred seasons. And for the commission of so great a crime, paying the penalty and manner of an ignominious death, in the common square of the Martroi, in the sight of all, they were flayed alive; their virile members together with their genitals were cut off; and, their heads struck off, they were dragged to the common gallows. Completely stripped of skin, they were hanged by the shoulder blades and joints of their arms. Afterwards, near them, a certain doorkeeper, as one who seemed rightly to have been an accomplice and privy to the aforesaid crime, and many others as well, both noble and ignoble, of either sex, who appeared to have consented to or known of the said offense, were subjected to torture; some were drowned in swift waters; many perished by secret deaths; yet several, found innocent, escaped entirely. Among these especially was a certain Dominican friar, called the Bishop of Saint George, who was said to have been a collaborator and accomplice in the aforesaid crime, whether by sorceries that incited people to illicit acts. Some said he was detained in prison at Paris among the Dominican friars; others that, since the apostolic see was then vacant, he had been sent to the cardinals and left to their judgment. Moreover, although Joan, sister of the said Blanche and wife of Philip, Count of Poitiers, was at first strongly regarded as suspect in the matter and was for some time separated from her husband and kept under guard in the castle of Dourdan, nevertheless, after an inquiry made on this account, she was cleared of the said suspicion and judged blameless and entirely innocent in the Parliament at Paris, in the presence of the Count of Valois, the Count of Évreux, and many other nobles. And thus, before a year had passed, she deserved to be reconciled to her husband, the count.

Margareta Navarræ regina juvencula, et Blancha regis Navarrse Karoli fratris junioris uxor, pro adulterio ab eis lurpissime frequentato et perpetrato cum Philippo et Galterode Alncto fralribus militibus, a prima videlicet cum Philippo et altera cum Galtero, suis exigentibus culpis, a propriis repudiatæ conjugibus, omni non immerito honore temporali privatee, deputantur carceribus, ut ibi sub arcta custodia, omni humano destitutæ solatio, infeliciter agerent vitara , et miserabiliter finirent. Duo vero præfati milites cum iion solum iiequam adulteri, sed et dominorum suorum conjugii violatores nequissimi , qui de ipsis , tamquam familiaribus nimis domesticis, prsecipuam gerebant fiduciam, cumque de eorum vestibus et familia reputarentur vera scientia , et erant pessimi proditores, necnon mulierculis ipsis, adhuc setate juvenculis , quas , prosexu fragili , suis lenociniis et blandimentis illexerant, raulto raagis in facto culpabiles; apudPontisaram, die veneris post Quasimodo , confessi sunt hoc scelus quasi per triennium frequentasse , pluribus locis et quandoque temporibus sacrosanclis. Proque tanti perpetratione flagitii ignominiosæ mortis genus et poenam luentes, in communi platea Martrei , cunctis videnlibus, vivi excoriati , eisquc virilibus una cum genitalibus amputatis, cæsisque capitibusad commune patibulum Iracti , cunctisque omnino corio denudatls , per spatulas et brachiorum compagines suspenduntur. Postmodum juxta eos ostiarius, quasi qui fautor et conscius prædicti sceleris merito videbatur, multi etiam tamnobiliumquam ignobilium utriusque sexus, qui præfati facinoris consentientes videbantur aut conscii, plerique tormentis quæstionati fuerunt, aliqui vero in aquis vehementibus submersi, plurimi vero occultis mortibus perierunt; plerlque innocentes reperti penitus evaserunt, inter quos præcipue quidam frater Prsedicator, dictus episcopus sancti Georgii , qui aut sorlilegiis qui homines provocabant ad illi- cita, cooperator et conscius meraorati flagitii dicebatur, quem aliqui dixerunt Parisius apud fratres Prædicatores carcere fuisse detentum , alii vero cardinalibus, cum jam vacaret sedes apostolica , destinatum , et eorum judicio derelictum. Porro etsi Johanna , dictæ Blanchæ soror, sponsa Philippi comitis Pictavensis, vehementer in casu habita fuerit in principio pro suspecta , et a viro suo aliquamdiu separata, et apud Durdanum castrum sub carcerali custodia reservata, post inqutestam nihilominus ob hoc factam, a prædicta suspicione purgata, inculpabilis et omnino innoxia in parlamento Parisius, præsentibus comile Valesii et comite Ebroicensi multisque nobilibus aliis, judicatur, et sic, anno minime revoluto, reconciliari promeruit comiti sponso suo.

Become a Member via our Buy Me a Coffee page to read more.

Metrical Chronicle of Godefroy of Paris.
En celle année adonc, en may,In that year then, in May 1314,
Un temps plain de jolietéA time full of joy
l'u tornée en adversitéWas turned into adversity
Au royaume, dont l'en parleraFor the kingdom, of which men will speak6225
Tant com le monde durera.As long as the world shall endure.
Tout chant et baudor et léesceAll song and mirth and gladness
Torné fussent à grant destréce,Were turned to great distress,
Du cas qui lors en France avint ;By the event that then in France befell;
Dont escorcher il en convintFor which it was fitting to flay6230
Deux chevalier, joli et gai,Two knights, handsome and gay,
Gautier et Phelippe d'Aunay.Gautier and Philippe d’Aunay.
De pere, de mere, frere estoient.Of father and mother they were brothers.
Ce fu por ce qu'il maintenoient ,It was because they maintained,
L'un la seur du duc de Bourgoingne ,The one, the sister of the Duke of Burgundy,6235
Dont il faisoit sa grant vergoingne ;Bringing upon her great shame;
L'autre frere la fille avonteThe other brother dishonoured the daughter
De Bourgoingne , dont France a honte.Of Burgundy, of whom France is ashamed.
A tort partout la ehose en court.Wrongly the matter runs everywhere.
La fille au conte si avoitThe count’s daughter indeed had6240
Une suer qui riens ne savoitA sister who knew nothing
De la royne et de sa suer,Of the queen and of her sister,
Car el n'estoit pas de leur cuer,For she was not of their inner circle,
N'au segré conseil appelée.Nor called to the secret counsel.
Si vit ele mainte Jornée,Thus she saw on many a day6245
Maint semblant qui li desplaisoit ;Many a sign that displeased her;
Mes de ce pas parler n'osoit ,But of this she dared not speak,
Por la honte de son lignage,For the shame of her lineage,
Et por corrous et pour damage,And to avoid anger and harm;
Eschiver : car qui le tout taist ,For he who keeps all silent6250
Vers tous a pais, vers nul n'a plaist.Has peace with all, and pleases none.
Mes il il n'est nul feu sans fumée.But there is no fire without smoke.
Lors est la chose ainsi alée.Thus the matter went its course.
Le fet fu ataint et prouvé,The deed was discovered and proved,
Qui jà grant piece avoit couvé ;Which had long lain hidden;6255
Et en appert fu congnéuAnd it was openly known
De Phelippe, que il géuOf Philippe, that he had lain
Ot plusors fois, à sa vaillence,Many times, with her consent,
Et saus force et sans contrestance ,And without force or resistance,
A la royne de Navarre ;With the Queen of Navarre;6260
Et tout ce que de lui requerreAnd all that he wished to ask of her
Vouloit, avoit entierement.He had entirely.
Je ne sai par quoi ne commentI know not by what nor how
Ainsi entr'elz deux accordérent,Thus those two came to agreement,
Més en mainte guise en parlerentBut in many ways did people speak of it;6265
Les gens; li uns communémentSome commonly said
Distrent que par enchantementThey agreed by enchantment;
Acorderent ; li autre direntOthers said
Que sans enchantement le firent.They did it without enchantment.
Créez lequel que vous voudrez,Believe whichever you will,6270
Et non pas tout ce qu'en orrez.But not all that you hear.

Funeral of Piers Gaveston

Annals Londonienses. [2nd January 1315] In the same year, Piers Gaveston, Earl of Cornwall, who had been killed and had not yet been buried but lay unburied at Oxford with the Friars Preachers, was now committed to the earth at Langley [Map] with great honour. For this, the king constructed a church of the Friars Preachers at that place.

Eodem anno Petrus de Gavastone, comes Cornubiæ, interfectus, et qui non fuit adhue humatus, sed apud Oxoniam jacuit inhumatus ad Fratres Prædicatores, nunc terre traditur apud Langeleie, cum maximo honore; pro quo rex construxit ecclesiam Fratrum Prædicatorum ibidem.

Life of Edward II by a Monk of Malmesbury. A few days after Christmas [2nd January 1315], the lord King Edward had the body of Piers de Gaveston—formerly his special friend—transferred from Oxford to Langley. For now more than two years had passed since his beheading, and until this time, he had lain unburied among the friars at Oxford. It is said that the king had intended first to avenge Peter's death, and only afterward to commit his body to burial. But now, those from whom the king had once sought vengeance had been reconciled with him in friendship. At Langley, where the king had already built a house for the Dominican Friars, he honourably buried his Peter's body.

Post Natale Domini paucis evolutis diebus dominus Bmrilot o rex corpus Petri de Gavestone, sui quondam specialis amici, ab Oxonia ad Langeleye fecit transferri. Jam enim de capitatione ipsius biennium transivit et amplius, et usque nune apud fratres Oxonim jacuit inhumatus. Proposuerat namque rex, ut dicitur, prius mortem Petri vindieasse, deinde corpus ejus sepulture tradidisse. Sed jam revocati in amicitiam sunt ex quibus videbatur rex petere vindictam. Rex apud Langeleye, ubi fratribus Prædicatoribus jam pridem domum construxit, corpus sui Petri honorifice sepelivit.

Death of Queen Consort Margaret of France

William of Worcester's Chronicle of England

William of Worcester, born around 1415, and died around 1482 was secretary to John Fastolf, the renowned soldier of the Hundred Years War, during which time he collected documents, letters, and wrote a record of events. Following their return to England in 1440 William was witness to major events. Twice in his chronicle he uses the first person: 1. when writing about the murder of Thomas, 7th Baron Scales, in 1460, he writes '… and I saw him lying naked in the cemetery near the porch of the church of St. Mary Overie in Southwark …' and 2. describing King Edward IV's entry into London in 1461 he writes '… proclaimed that all the people themselves were to recognize and acknowledge Edward as king. I was present and heard this, and immediately went down with them into the city'. William’s Chronicle is rich in detail. It is the source of much information about the Wars of the Roses, including the term 'Diabolical Marriage' to describe the marriage of Queen Elizabeth Woodville’s brother John’s marriage to Katherine, Dowager Duchess of Norfolk, he aged twenty, she sixty-five or more, and the story about a paper crown being placed in mockery on the severed head of Richard, 3rd Duke of York.

Available at Amazon in eBook and Paperback format.

On 14th February 1318 Margaret of France Queen Consort England (age 39) died at Marlborough Castle [Map]. She was buried at Christ Church, Greyfriars [Map]. Her tomb was destroyed during the Reformation.